Protect Your Fertility!

Dear Readers,
The American Society of Reproductive Medicine has launched a campaign with the aim of educating women on how to protect their fertility by avoiding certain risk factors. The Society has made available a number of fact sheets, graphics and brochures that are all downloadable on their "Protect Your Fertility" page. At our center we also offer the ability to extend the fertility of a woman by either freezing her eggs or her embryos. See "Fertility Preservation" for more information.

Check out the selection of fact sheets, infographics and a brochure on the ASRM page, including:

• "Advancing Age Decreases Your Ability To Have Children"
• "Smoking and Infertility"
• "Protect Your Fertility Brochure"
• "Impact of Age on Female Fertility"
• "Practicing Safe Sex Now Protects Your Ability To Have Children Later"

To quote ASRM: "At the risk of sounding like your high school health teacher, the decisions you make today really can impact your fertility and ability to have kids later. That's why it's so important to learn how to take care of your body. After all, there's a huge difference between choosing not to have kids and physically being unable to conceive if and when you want to."

Be proactive about your fertility health!

Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., F.A.C.O.G.
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
www.montereybayivf.com

Monterey, California, U.S.A.

Follicles Too Big In Clomid Ovulation Induction Cycle

Hello,
I am writing from San Diego, CA.  I was on 100mg Clomid on Cycle Day 3-7, then 2mg estradiol on cd 8-12. I went in for an ultrasound to check follicles on cycle day 13.  My RE said that this was most likely a lost cycle because I had 2 dominant follicles at 26 and 31 mm.  He gave me an HCG trigger because he did not want the follicles to get bigger and become cysts.  My uterine lining was 14 mm, and my RE was happy with that.  My husband and I had intercourse the day of the trigger and the day after, then skipped a day and had intercourse one more time.  

Were the follicles too big?  Do we have any chance of conceiving this cycle?  I have also been feeling cramps since yesterday at 7 days after the trigger.  Is this normal?  

Thanks for your input. L. from San Diego

Answer:

Hello L. from the U.S. (San Diego),

I don't have the ability to foresee the future, and certainly exceptions can occur, however, the follicle sizes were too big.  Usually once the follicle is greater than 24 mms, the egg within is overmature and therefore no longer viable.  Ovulation may occur but that is the main problem.  Also, it is highly likely that these follicles will turn cystic (persist) and have to be suppressed with birth control pills. You need to make sure a baseline ultrasound is done to evaluate for this at the start of your next cycle.

So, statistically and physiologically speaking, this cycle is probably a bust.  Unfortunately, your doctor missed the appropriate point by not doing the ultrasound early enough.  Next cycle he should begin looking at cycle day #9 or 10, which is what I do.  If I'm too early that's okay because nothing is lost and gives me a better idea of follicular development.  If you're too late, as in your cycle, then then cycle is lost; a big price to pay.

Good Luck,

Dr. Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., FACOG
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
www.montereybayivf.com

Monterey, California, U.S.A.

Similar IVF Protocol But Different Results: Why?

Question:

Hi Dr. Ramirez,

I'm back again with a question about my recent IVF (second one). This IVF (in vitro fertilization) cycle we did the same protocol as last time (antagonist) but started off at a higher dose of Gonal-f based on my response last cycle. This cycle we started off at 300iu gonal-f and 75iu menopur whereas last cycle we started with 225iu gonal f and 75 IU menopur but had to increase to 300 IU gonal f after day 4 showed an E2 of only 90. Both cycles I started out with similar AFCs of 10 and 12 at suppression check. My usual AFC is between 16-20. Last cycle it seemed that I recruited more follies along the way and ended up with an E2 of 3030 and 23 eggs retrieved (17 of which were mature based on icsi and conventional fert rates as we did 50/50 split fertilization). This cycle my E2 was 2100 at trigger and they retrieved 12 eggs (still waiting on fert report today but we are doing all conventional fertilization).

My question is why did I have such a different response this cycle given that we started off at a higher dose this cycle compared to last? Last cycle we went up from 225iu gonal to 300 IU gonal at day 4 and stayed there until trigger. this cycle we started at 300iu gonal and stayed there until we added ganirelex on day 7. At that point my E2 stalled and do they increased my gonal f to 375iu gonal f and kept me there until trigger.

As always thanks for your advice/insight. S. from the U.S.A.

Answer:

Hello S. from the U.S. (Virginia).

The human body is not a consistent nor predictable structure so I can't explain why your response is different.  I have always explained to patients that have low response to stims that the ovaries can react differently each cycle and your experience is a case in point.  That being said, I would not have increased your dosage since your stimulation was so good the previous time and you bordered on entering OHSS territory.  In any case, IVF is not a contest where the person with the highest number of follicles or eggs wins the prize.  The goal is to find 1 or 2 perfect eggs that will lead to perfect embryos and a successful pregnancy.  So despite the fact that you stimulated less, that might be a better thing.  Bottom line is you only need one good one.  Also, there have been some studies showing that when a patient stimulates hard with lots of follicles, sometimes the egg quality suffers and the pregnancy rate drops.  This is especially true in PCO patients.  In those patients, our preference is to stimulate less and get fewer follicles.

So, in any case, as the saying goes: "I don't think you should sweat the nitty gritty" i.e the fine details.  Hope for the one perfect one.  That is the goal.

Good Luck!

Dr. Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., FACOG
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
www.montereybayivf.com

Monterey, California, U.S.A.

Is A Tubal Reversal A Good Option For Me?

QUESTION:

I am a 33 year old mother of two. My children are 11 and nearly 10 years old.  After the birth of my second child in 2003 I had surgery to prevent further pregnancies. (I was in an unhappy marriage and only 23, and couldn't see myself ever getting out with 2 children.) The doctor was reluctant, because I was so young, but he decided to go ahead and perform the sterilization surgery. My tubes are not cut or clipped or burnt, they just have little clips on them to prevent the egg from passing through.  But just as many people predicted, now I regret the decision.  

I am divorced, my children are growing up, and I am in a wonderful relationship with a man who has no children of his own but would very much like to have one.  Barring infertility issues on his part, is there much hope of us being able to reverse my tubal and conceive a child of our own?  I don't have any other medical issues. I am healthy and active, average healthy weight, non-smoking, non-drinking...same for him. He is 39 and I'll be 34 this year, so we feel like the clock is ticking on any opportunity for another child.  Can this surgery be done, what are the odds of conception afterwards, what factors do I need to consider, how long do you need to wait after the surgery before trying to conceive.  And what is the average cost??  I appreciate any answers you can give me on the matter.

Thank-you! K. from Kentucky

ANSWER:

Hello K. from the U.S. (Kentucky),

The type of tubal ligation that you have is the best to reverse because the majority of the tube is kept intact and there is minimal damage to adjacent tubes.  Also, considering you are young still, a tubal reversal would be a good option in your case. A good and experienced gynecologist or reproductive specialist can do the reversal either by laparoscopy (using a scope and little incisions) or by a mini-laparotomy (a small incision above the pubic bone. You would want to find a surgeon who is well experienced in this and does them a lot to get the best chances for success.  

I have had a patient who went to North Carolina to have hers done by a doc who only does reversals. The risks for this procedure are the same risks as for any surgery (infection, bleeding, general anesthesia, injury to adjacent structures, failure) but this is not considered a major surgery, but rather should be an outpatient (same day) surgery.  In terms of success, those rates can vary widely so I can't give you an exact number.  A good surgeon will have an 80% success rate in patients under 35 years old after 1 year of trying.  If a pregnancy does not occur within 1 year, then the procedure probably has failed.  

Basically, with a tubal reversal, all you are doing is attempting to restore your natural fertility rate. This rate is very age dependent.  Your chances of natural pregnancy at 25 years old was 85% per year whereas at 35 it will be 30% per year because your eggs have aged.  So, keep these statistics in mind. The alternative to a tubal reversal, and with a higher likelihood of success is In Vitro Fertilization, but the down side is you would have to do this every time you wanted a child from this point on.  With a reversal, you could continue to have children by natural means if you wanted more than one.  Cost wise, tubal reversal will vary depending on the doctor, the clinic and whether or not it is done in an outpatient surgery center or hospital.  The cheapest I have seen is about $6000 and is done in an outpatient surgery center.  Hospital performed reversals will be $15,000-18,000.  I hope that gives you the information you needed.

Good Luck,

Dr. Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., FACOG
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
www.montereybayivf.com

Monterey, California, U.S.A.

Comment: Thank you so much, once again. Armed with the information you provided, we can now move forward! I feel like I got lucky having my question go to such a knowledgeable and open volunteer!

Secondary Amenorrhea: A Description, Not A Diagnosis

Question:

Hello Dr. Ramirez,

I'm 20 and 293 pounds. I have had  Secondary Amenorrhea for close to 4 years now. It is apparently being caused by my weight. I'm not planning to TTC for at least another 12 or 13 years. I don't hate babies but it's not just a good time on the emotional or financial level to have them. If I'm able to get down to a decent weight and get rid of this disease,  What are my chances of getting pregnant when it's time for me to TTC???

There's a history of Diabetes in my family and I haven't had a asthma attack since I was 8.My mom had thyroid disease before I was born but I don't think that's genetic. But I don't have any other diseases than the SA at the current moment and my hormone levels were just fine at my last doctor appt which was last October. I've been on progesterone more than I count and it gets me a period but I want to have it without the help of drugs. Is there some kind of natural cure to SA??

I know that it seems a bit silly to ask about this NOW but I'm not getting any real answers about this disease from my OB. Everytime I asked my OB about this, she would tell me not to worry about it or brings a therapist in the room to basically tell me that I'm crazy.

She's since moved her practice out of state and I have a new OB that I'll start seeing very soon. But how in the hell am I crazy for wanting to be proactive about my own health?? I'm sorry for the language but I'm just so fed up about this and at my wits end.

I know that I'm not producing eggs right now but what else could this be doing to my body?? Do I have a reason to be concerned about it besides the obvious infertility scare?? If I do get rid of this disease,  Is there some kind of leftover side effect that could cause me to get Ovarian Cancer in the future??

I don't have these answers and I need to know what's going on. Please help me clear at least some of this up.

Thank You. D. R. from Michigan.

Answer:

Hello D. R. from the U.S. (Michigan),

Good riddance to your previous Ob doctor!  "Secondary Amenorrhea" is a description of a problem and NOT a diagnosis.  It just means that you used to have periods and now you don't.  It doesn't explain the cause.  The most common reason for old women to have secondary amenorrhea is menopause.  The most common reason for young women to have secondary amenorrhea is pregnancy.  However, a close second is an ovarian disorder called "Polycystic ovarian disease."  This diagnosis is manifested by irregular or rare natural menstrual cycles and at least one of the following findings: ovaries that look like PCO ovaries on ultrasound, inverted FSH/LH ratio, obesity, hirsuitism (increased facial hair), elevated testosterone levels, diabetes, elevate insulin levels signifying insulin resistance.  I think that you have PCOD but without a thorough endocrine evaluation, I cannot say for sure. 

With this disorder, you have a hormonal imbalance and that needs to be corrected.  The most simple way to do that is to use a low androgen birth control pill such as Yaz.  Once you are ready for pregnancy, then you will have to use fertility medications, which actually do not increase your fertility but induce your ovaries to ovulate, so that you can give off an egg to get pregnant.  You need to see a COMPETENT gynecologist or a reproductive endocrinologist to be evaluated and treated correctly!

You may want to see a more detailed explanation of Polycystic Ovarian Disease on my website.

Glad you wrote! Good Luck,

Edward J. Ramirez, M.D.
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility And Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF

www.montereybayivf.com

Monterey, California, U.S.A.

 

Woman With Secondary Infertility & Possible Blocked Tube: Misdiagnosed? Surgery? What To Do?

Question:

I had an HSG (hysterosalpingogram) in November. The dye flowed freely through my left tube, which appeared normal and healthy.  However, the dye would not enter my right tube until after the radiologist had me get on my right and then left side. The dye then went into the tube and appeared to flow freely, but then it stopped abruptly mid way in the tube.The visible part of the tube appeared normal and healthy.  My RE told me that it is extremely rare for a woman to have a blocked tube in the middle of the tube unless she's had her tubes tied and that it was possible I was just born with half a tube.

I recently had a laparoscopy in June to get more info about the cause of my infertility and to attempt to repair the right tube. The dye again flowed freely in the left tube. My doctor inspected the right tube, and found that it appeared to be completely normal and healthy in every respect. However, again, the dye entered the right tube and stopped mid way. 

After the surgery, my doctor told me that I had no endometriosis or adhesions of any kind. She also told me that I had no evidence of any tubal disease or previous infection in my pelvic cavity.  The only abnormalities that were found were a large paratubal cyst that had wrapped around my good left tube (the cyst was successfully removed), and a small polyp during the hysteroscopy (also removed).  I also have never had any other surgeries or ectopic pregnancies. 

My RE told me she had no idea what was blocking the tube, but not to worry about it because research shows that having one healthy tube does not really decrease your chances that much for Clomid/IUI or timed intercourse.  Still, it's very frustrating to me because I thought that laparoscopy was 100% method for diagnosing the cause of a blocked tube, but I have no more info about the cause of blocked tube than when I started.

I am 38 and my FSH and AMH values are excellent, and my hubby passed his sperm analysis. I have a 2 year old that was conceived after 8 months and we have been trying for #2 for 1.5 years.  Although I understand that having just one tube should not affect my chances that much, I am still concerned because at this point, it is our only known issue.    

My questions are:  1. What could have caused the blockage in my tube?  2. Is it possible that the tube is not actually blocked but is not flowing for some other reason (I've heard about false diagnoses of blocked tubes due to preferential flow or not enough dye being used)?  3.  Is there any other way to find out what is blocking my tube?  4.  Is it worth it to pursue surgery to repair the tube like I've seen for women who undergo tubal reversal surgery?  

Thank you! C. from Atlanta

Answer:

Hello C. from the U.S. (Atlanta),

To answer your questions in order:

1.  The most common cause of a mid-tubal blockage, that is not from prior surgery, is an internal tubal infection.  Many of the bacteria that cause this type of scarring can do so without any type of symptom.  A laparoscopy would not be able to find this type of injury and, other than the HSG, there is no way to examine the inside of the tubes.

2.  It is possible that there was tubal "spasm" causing the tube to appear blocked, but I doubt it because the Radiologist was able to get the dye to flow down part of the tube.  However, if you think that it my not be an accurate test, then I would recommend that you have another one, but have your doctor specifically request that they pay most attention to the right tube i.e. do the test so that the dye preferably goes down the right side.  Remember, fluid will always go down the side of least resistance.

3.  There is no other testing that can be done to examine the tube.  Scope technology is still not small enough.

4.  NO.  Such surgery can cause pelvic scar tissue and impair your fertility more.

First, I think you need to consider ALL the factors involved in your fertility potential.  Yes, it is possible to get pregnant naturally (intercourse or IUI) with one normal tube, but there is no way to prevent the egg from going into the tube that is blocked, so your chances are actually decreased. 

Second, you are 38 years old which means that your natural chances of pregnancy are already reduced significantly down to 3-5% per month (15% per year), which is further reduced if you add the tubal problem. Even with IUI your max chance of pregnancy based on your age is only about 7-10% per month not considering the tubal issue. The fact that you have been pregnant before is a positive factor and increases your success with assisted reproduction. If you want that second child right away and if you were my patient, I would strongly urge you to consider IVF. 

Third, you have to decide which of two assumptions are correct: the tube was blocked from a prior bacteria, which probably went to the opposite tube as well but did not cause blockage, but did cause damage vs the blocked tube was the only injury and the opposite tube is therefore normal.  If the open tube is injured, which cannot be proven but is possible, it may not be functioning normally despite being open.  Keep in mind that fluid can pass through even the smallest opening.  In that case, you will not be able to get pregnant naturally and so IVF would be the treatment of choice.  Because of your age, I would make the assumption that the tube is damaged (mainly because you have not been able to get pregnant naturally when you were able to previously) and therefore recommend IVF.  It is the most successful and expedient treatment option for you. 

If your doctor wants to waste time and try something less like ovulation induction or IUI, that is fine as you understand that the risk you are taking is losing the opportunity to get pregnant with your own eggs and more time passes. I hope this second opinion is useful to you.

Good Luck,

Edward J. Ramirez, M.D.
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility And Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF

www.montereybayivf.com

Monterey, California, U.S.A.

 

Finally Pregnant After Multiple Miscarriages: "I Am A Nervous Wreck!"

Hello Dr. Ramirez,

I've written you in the past regarding my fertility challenges and your responses have been very encouraging. In my last, I discussed how I'd experienced an early loss in March after our first IVF attempt. You encouraged me to be strong and keep trying that my chances were good. You were right. I waited until my next cycle began and started a more simple IUI cycle again with just Follistim injections. My first miscarriage in April 2012 after IUI with Femara/GonalF was caused by trisomy 3. I found studies that said use of Femara in some women could increase the chances of aneuploidy. This time we tried without the Femara and I have become pregnant again.

I have gone through the complete RPL panel-DNA analysis, autoimmune, alloimmune, thyroid, hysteroscopy, etc. Everything has been normal. I believe the second miscarriage, because it began just 16 days after embryo transfer, was due to my body being weak (I was very sick during stimulation and had a lap/hysteroscopy/cystectomy 3 weeks before I started stimulants). I am 32, maybe borderline diminishing reserve (last AMH was .9), but otherwise nothing really bad with me.

So I am currently past 9 weeks. My betas doubled and were actually in the higher end of the ranges for weeks along. I did a viability ultrasound at 5 weeks and could see the heartbeat. Embryo measured exactly the right size. At 7 weeks we could hear the heartbeat at 174. RE saw me again at 8 weeks and said I looked good, released me to my OBGYN, said most women miscarry between 7-8 weeks. I've had no spotting or cramping. OBGYN is letting me do weekly scans until I'm through my first trimester. Heartbeat has stayed in the 170 range. Growth is continuing. Last ultrasound at 9 weeks showed the baby kicking its legs.

Here's the thing - I'm a nervous wreck. I'm terrified of something going wrong again. I am fighting to follow reason rather than fear but it is so hard. I have hardly any symptoms certainly none of the "noticeable" ones which means most of the time I don't feel like I'm pregnant. My last HCG was only at 102,900 when it was checked at 8.5 weeks, which I felt was low for where it had been but I know it slows down. My progesterone in the beginning was all the way up to 75 and is now holding at 30 (I had cysts leftover from after the IUI, made 3 follicles).
The statistics are all over the place. Some say less than 5% when heartbeat is detected but that can jump to 20% if you've had prior losses. I read it's even less once you enter the fetal stage past 8.5 weeks.

I feel stupid for asking but your answers are thoughtful. What do you think my chances are of carrying this baby to term? What would you say my change of miscarriage is? And why in the world do I hardly feel anything? I'm a little tired in the evenings and I pee in the middle of the night with crazy dreams, breasts are bigger but not sore, no nausea, etc.  But hardly anything to notice. Thank you so much for your time.  L. from Indiana

Answer:

Hello L. from the U.S. (Indiana),

CONGRATULATIONS :)  Like your RE, I release my patients at 8 1/2 weeks gestational age because the risk of miscarriage is minimal.  Statistics show that the risk of miscarriage is up to 50% prior to 8 weeks gestational age and then decreases to 5% up to 12 weeks gestation.  So you are now at 5% risk but the fact that all the signs have been good, is very encouraging and I would not worry about miscarrying.  At this point, the only risk of a miscarriage would be if there is a major genetic abnormality, and this would be a baby that you wouldn't want to go to term any way.  You should certainly consider genetic testing early to check on that.  There is now a blood screening test that can be done at an early stage.

In my experience, and as evidenced by the data, most patients will have a successful pregnancy and delivery at this point.  The fact that you "don't feel any different" with this pregnancy is irrelevant.  Every pregnancy is different and different people experience pregnancy differently.  Some have pregnancy symptoms and some have none.  You may be one of the lucky ones that doesn't have to suffer with the "morning sickness" or other such symptoms.  For now, pray that all continues to go well and thank God for the blessing.

Good Luck,

Edward J. Ramirez, M.D.
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility And Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF

www.montereybayivf.com

Monterey, California, U.S.A.