Can Lubricants Interfere With Getting Pregnant?

Question:

Hi there. I was wondering if you can tell me if using a lubricant like KY sensitive Jelly can hurt your chances of getting pregnant. My husband and I just started using it a few months ago and we have been trying to conceive. I just read online that it can be toxic to sperm. Does this mean that you cannot get pregnant at all while using the lubricant or that it just lowers your chances? We will stop using it if we don't get pregnant this month. Thank you. J. from New York

Answer:

Hello J. from the U.S. (New York),

The rule of thumb is that lubricants like KY can interfere with sperm mobility and therefore also the ability to achieve pregnancy. Some lubricants can kill sperm but it depends completely on the formulation. Johnson and Johnson does make a version that is compatible with attempting pregnancy and there are other companies that produce "fertility-friendly" lubricants as well. You have to look specifically for one that states that it is compatible with trying for pregnancy. Some alternate brands you might want to look at are "Pre-Seed" or "Conceive Plus".

Good Luck,
Dr. Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., FACOG
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
http://www.montereybayivf.com/
Monterey, California, U.S.A.

TTC Patient Needs Aggressive Approach After Laparoscopy For Endometrioma or "Chocolate Cyst"

Question:

Hi, I have been trying to conceive since 1 year. I am 29 yrs old,and a professional with busy working schedules. I recently got myself investigated and found that my FSH levels r 7.09 and LH levels 3.0, AMH levels 3.29.

I have undergone 2 ovulation induction cycles which showed normal ovulation but I have a tendency towards cyst formation. HSG is normal. My antral follicle count is 6 and 4 in both ovaries. Kindly opine if i should undergo IUI cycles with clomiphene or with gonadotropins or should I directly go ahead with IVF cycle?

I am worried as my FSH levels are on the higher side and also my FSH:LH ratio is >2:1.

I recently underwent a hysterolaproscopy and was found to have a small chocolate cyst of 1cm in one ovary that was removed with cyst wall and spot on the other ovary along with few spots in the P.O.D that were fulgerated. Rest of findings were normal....no adhesions, healthy tubes with free spill and good uterine cavity.

From what I have learnt, endometriotic ovaries have a poor ovarian reserve and chances of recurrence of endometriosis is also high. My FSH values are already in the upper range.So what do you suggest i should go for? What sort of induction should I undergo?

Thank you. S. from India

Answer:

Hello, S. from India,

First, let me reassure you that your lab tests, including FSH level, are all normal.

More important were the findings after your laparoscopy. With an endometriotic cyst present (chocolate cyst or endometrioma), we would automatically classify you has having stage 3 endometriosis. Studies have shown that stage 3 and 4 endometriosis affect fertility. Normally, with these stages IVF would be the recommended treatment of choice. But considering that you are young, there are some lesser options that you can try.

First, let me point out that your diagnosis is "Endometriosis" as the cause of your infertility. It has been treated by laparoscopy thus far. However, we know that if there is visible endometriosis present on a laparoscopy, then microscopic endometriosis exists as well.

For infertility patients, I recommend a 3-6 month course of Lupron depot therapy to get rid of any residual endometriosis before moving forward with any treatment. This medication will put you in a semi-menopausal state for the duration of the treatment but there will not be any long term effects. You can then begin treatment immediately thereafter. Because endometriosis will return within six months after ending this treatment, I would recommend that you proceed with a more aggressive treatment such as insemination. I would recommend four attempts, using Clomid 150mg or higher to have 2-3 ovulatory sized follicles per cycle, alternating with Femara 5.0-7.5 mg since you don't want to take Clomid in consecutive months (it can lead to poor endometrial lining formation and prevent pregnancy, among other things).

If you don't achieve pregnancy by four good IUI cycles, then I would proceed directly to IVF.

The alternative would be to go directly to IVF, in which case, it is not absolutely necessary to take the Lupron treatment, although some docs still will do this. IVF bypasses the pelvis and takes the eggs out of this hostile environment. It is the preferred treatment for stage 3 or 4 endometriosis. It will also be the fastest way for you to get pregnant.

Good Luck,

Dr. Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., FACOG
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
www.montereybayivf.com
Monterey, California, U.S.A.

IVF Patient Has False Negative On Pregnancy Test: Late Implantation? What Went Wrong?

Question:

Dr.Ramirez,

I have written to you in the past and you have always been such a great sounding board. I need help and closure and I am hoping that you can help.

In September I went through IVF (in vitro fertilization). On 9/7 I transferred 2 embryos- 1 7cell grade AF and a 4cell grade BF. On 9/16 I had some light spotting and cramping. My beta was on 9/19 (12dp3dt)was negative & my RE instructed me to stop taking the PIO & Estrace. A few days later, what I thought was my period arrived. It was a medium flow w/some small clotting & lasted about 4 days & stopped. A couple of days later, I started bleeding very heavily & passing large clots. I went in to see my RE. She conducted an Ultrasound & some blood work to make sure I wasn't anemic. At that time I asked her to run a pregnancy test. She said that there was no way that I could have been pregnant but did it anyway. The next day she called to tell me my beta was 512!

I am absolutely devastated. I can't believe that I was pregnant the whole time. My RE is calling it a biochemical pregnancy and is saying that it probably wasn’t a healthy pregnancy but I am getting the feeling that they are trying to place blame elsewhere. I feel like I need some questions answered by a neutral party. I am having a hard time moving on so maybe you may be able to offer me some closure.

1.Should something have shown up on the beta 12dp3dt? If not, do you think it was a lab error?

2.Could it have shown as negative because of late implantation? If the cramping/spotting on the evening of the 16th was implantation, would HCG have shown up on the morning of the 19th?

3.I have a luteal phase defect. What effect/impact would stopping the PIO and Estrace have on the pregnancy? Do you think that stopping meds was the reason for the miscarriage?

4.My beta was 512 after bleeding for over a week (heavily). I would think it was much higher to start. Do you think that this would have been a healthy pregnancy?

5.Should the clinic have done a 2nd beta?

6.Any suggestions on where to go from here? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

D. from Boston, MA

Answer:

Hello D. from the U.S. (Boston),

Certainly what you have gone through is very unusual and unfortunate. It shows that late implantation exists. I usually do my first bHCG at 8-9 days post embryo transfer. I do two bHCG's, one at that time and another 48 hrs after. I have had a successful pregnancy case where the first bHCG was negative (<1) and the second positive (14) that went on to deliver a beautiful baby. Keep in mind, however, that there are no specific protocols regarding how many bHCG's to do and it is totally up to the medical director of your clinic.
I cannot answer the question about the cramping and spotting on the 16th. If you have a luteal phase defect, then yes, stopping the supplemental hormones can lead to a miscarriage. There is no way to know if this was the reason for your loss because there are many other possibilities as well, such as an abnormal embryo. I cannot answer your question about whether or not this pregnancy would have been healthy. The number was certainly a good and high number.

What is important to keep in mind at this point: This experience showed that you can achieve pregnancy. IVF only has the capability of giving you the opportunity to become pregnant. It cannot force a pregnancy on you. Keep in mind that the last two steps required to achieve pregnancy, embryo hatching and exiting the shell and implantation are natural steps. We don't have the technology to make these happen. That is why I say that IVF can only give you the opportunity. The last steps are in God's hands. The fact that implantation occurred (positive bHCG) shows that the last two steps took place and you can do it again.

Now you just have to maintain your hope, diligence and savvy. You've gotten this close. After all that you have been through, why would you not keep trying? Hopefully, the next one will be a "home run" or "touchdown" depending on which sport you prefer. If you don't try, you certainly won't be any closer to success, so don't give up!

Good Luck,
Dr. Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., FACOG
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
http://www.montereybayivf.com/
Monterey, California, U.S.A.

A Little Miracle...Seven Years In The Making

I want to share a special story with you, my readers, about a couple who went through a recent IVF (in vitro fertilization) cycle with us. This couple had come to us back in 2004 for infertility treatment. After the normal trial of IUI's (intra uterine insemination) did not work, they opted to do IVF with us. The cycle went well, the retrieval went well and there were three embryos to transfer. While doing the transfer of all three embryos, one embryo "floated" (aspirated) back out of the catheter. This was an unusual event for me and my staff. The couple decided to freeze that one reluctant embryo. Unfortunately, the patient did not become pregnant with that cycle. As it so happens, she soon became pregnant naturally and in the ensuing years, as sometimes happens, they had no trouble conceiving again, having three children in all.

In the meantime, the frozen embryo remained in our cryobank storage facility. The couple elected to leave the embryo there for the last seven years until recently. Grappling with the options of either continuing to pay for storage, dispose of the embryo or put it up for adoption, the couple opted to go forward with a frozen embryo transfer. We transferred the one embryo successfully and crazy as it may seem, the patient is now pregnant! This child will be both the "oldest" and the "youngest" sibling by virtue of this unusual series of events.

I am a spiritual man, if you have not guessed already. For us, every child is special, but I have a feeling that this child will truly be a special one, for it is my belief that for some divine reason his or her birth was delayed. How often I feel defeated when a cycle does not succeed and yet when something like this happens, I know that we can only do what we can up until a certain point, at which time the final steps of creation are taken out of our hands. Which brings me to one of my favorite quotes from Deepak: "When you live your life with an appreciation of coincidences and their meanings, you connect with the underlying field of infinite possibilities."

Atypia Is NOT An Absolute Indication For Hysterectomy

Question:

Hi Dr. Ramirez,

I'm a Canadian, temporarily living in South Africa. Greetings from Pretoria!

I'm 44 yrs old, diagnosed with PCOS at age 33, on metformin 500mg 2/day since then. I've got about 45 pounds to lose and have been slowly and steadily losing pounds since May (5 kg). I've never been able to get pregnant and throughout my 20s and early 30s, I went months without menstruation. Weight came on very quickly. I exercise regularly.

My new gyne here found a myoma in my uterus in August during my yearly exam. I had bleeding between periods almost every day for a few months. Some days it was spotting; other days it was heavier. The myoma was removed hysteroscopically and examined. The biopsy of the tumour shows atypical cells and the lab report summarizes the microscopy as "these features are most suggestive of an adenomyomatous (endometrial) polyp with focal atypia against the background of a proliferative endometrium."

I understand I need to remove my uterus.The doctor can do the surgery vaginally. Is uterus removal the best course of action? What can I do to prepare my body for no uterus? And Is there anything I can do to protect my ovaries going forward?

Thanks for your help in advance. S. from South Africa

Answer:

Hello S. from Canada and South Africa,

Atypia is NOT a absolute indication for hysterectomy, so no, you don't necessarily need to have your uterus removed. Atypia is not cancer, it is a pre-cancerous finding. It is possible that the only area of atypia was already removed, which then would have solved the problem. A repeat D&C should be done to evaluate the rest of the endometrial tissue. Also you should be cycles for three months then rechecked again by endometrial biopsy or D&C. If there is no abnormality found, then no other testing or treatment needs to be done other than keep you cycling on the birth control pill.

However, if you want you uterus out, and that is understandable, it is certainly a option for you and a vaginal hysterectomy would be fine. Make sure that your doctor keeps the ovaries intact i.e. does not remove them. You still need them to produce adequate hormone that your body needs. It's your choice. Make sure your doctor understands and is told that you want to keep your ovaries. There is absolutely no reason to have them removed.

Thank you for your question all the way from South Aftrica, addressing a problem that many women around the world face as well.

Good luck,

Dr. Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., FACOG
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
www.montereybayivf.com
Monterey, California, U.S.A.

Comment: Thank you Dr. Ramirez! Very timely and useful.

Why Do I Need HCG Injections After Ovulation During IUI Cycle?

Question:

Dr. Ramirez,

My husband and I have been trying to start our family for a few years. I have been pregnant and miscarried 3 times, but is has been over a year and a half since my last miscarriage. I am seeing a Reproductive Endocrinologist and their diagnosis for not getting pregnant again is unexplained infertility. We have are trying the IUI process now using Letrozole and I have also been given a prescription to do HCG injections on days 3, 6, and 9 past my LH surge. I am not finding very much information about using HCG after ovulation. I know their reasoning is to supplement my progesterone... but not sure why then, they don't just use progesterone? Please help!

Thank you! G. from Colorado

Answer:

Hello G. from the U.S. (Colorado),

HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin) injections can be used to support the luteal phase in place of progesterone and there is nothing wrong with that protocol. Most don't use that method because you have to take it as injections and the medication is considerably more expensive. There are many progesterone alternatives such as Crinone, Endometrin, Prometrium that can be used vaginally as a supplement. You should ask your doctor why they don't just use a progesterone supplement.

The other question to ask is "what are they treating or trying to achieve"? Do they suspect that your miscarriages are due to a luteal phase defect i.e. decreased progesterone? In that case testing by an end of cycle endometrial biopsy for dating and/or b-integrin would have diagnosed luteal phase defect and your diagnosis would not be "unexplained infertility." I am not a strong believer in "unexplained infertility" as a real entity. I think it is more like undiagnosed infertility. The cause just has not been found because either a test has not been done to find it or doesn't exist. Often we find that many of these cases of fertilization failures or defects with the sperm (found at the time of IVF) or endometriosis found on laparoscopy. Sometimes age is the problem as well leading to poor embryo quality.

Your question is a good one and you should ask your doctor. Be sure they explain everything to you!

Good Luck,
Dr. Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., FACOG
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
www.montereybayivf.com
Monterey, California, U.S.A.

Comment: Thank you so much... for all of your information and quick response! I will follow up with my doctor.

Patient On Metformin To Prevent Miscarriage: Is It Necessary?

Question:

HI Dr. Ramirez,

Sorry to keep this up about the Metformin, but you have been so helpful in the past...thought I would try your take on this.

I talked with my Doc about low dose heparin, and he told me that he does not prescribe this unless tested and confirmed thrombophilia is present, which he says I do not have. He would really like me to take the metformin. I have had one chemical pregnancy and one 9 week miscarriage and am currently 5 weeks pregnant. I took his advice and so far have taken 5 pills. I am extremely nauseated, which I know is from the Metformin as a few hours after it started. I REALLY DO NOT want to take this stuff after just recovering from OHSS. IS there any greater risk of miscarriage stopping now that I've started, and is there a greater risk of miscarriage if I don't take this med. I would love your thoughts on metformin and PCOS. Many sites are saying it really helps in the early stages of pregnancy for PCOS women to stay pregnant.

Thanks so much for your time....once again! C. from Canada

Answer:

Hello C. from Canada,

Metformin does nothing to help with a continuation of pregnancy and does not need to be continued once pregnant unless it was prescribed for diabetes. It is a pregnancy category B medication so is safe in pregnancy if your doctor insists that you continue it. If you were my patient, you would not be on it now. Metformin, given to help some PCO patients ovulate, is for that specific reason only. Once pregnant, the Metformin has done its job and is no longer required. If it is causing side effects, which it usually does, then I think I would recommend that you stop. There are absolutely NO recent studies that show that continuation of Metformin in PCO patients helps the pregnancy to survive or continue. Pregnancies continue or miscarry for many other reasons. Your doctor is mistaken but since he is the doctor you have chosen for your care, you have to decide if you are going to abide by his recommendations or not.

By the way, based on his comment about heparin, it is clear to me that he doesn't understand its use in recurrent miscarriage patients or infertility patients. It is obvious that he is not a specialist in that field. Please see my section on "Recurrent Pregnancy Loss".

P.S. Regardless of what many sites may be saying on the internet, you are wise to ask the advice of a medical professional.

Good luck,

Dr. Edward J. Ramirez, M.D., FACOG
Executive Medical Director
The Fertility and Gynecology Center
Monterey Bay IVF Program
http://www.montereybayivf.com/
Monterey, California, U.S.A.